THE URGENCY OF MORTGAGE AGREEMENT AS AN EFFORT TO REALIZE THE TRUST BY BANK AS CREDITOR
Abstract
This study focuses on the legal certainty of the implementation of loans for mortgage rights which are the object of collateral in the form of money-valued objects when bad loan occurs, which are regulated in the main agreement as an effort to manifest the trust of creditors of banking institutions whose existence is highly sought after by the Indonesian people. The method used in this study focuses on the normative with the conceptual approach and statute approach. The results of this study indicate that Credit agreements must be considered by the bank as creditor and by the customer as the debtor, considering that credit agreements have a vital function in granting, managing, and managing the credit itself. The existence of a guarantee in a bank credit agreement is significant, namely as a means of legal protection for bank security in overcoming risks. There is a certainty that the debtor customer will pay off his loan. This is based on the explanation of Banking Laws, PBI, and POJK, which requires banks' caution as creditors for loans to debtors based on the belief in the debtor's ability to pay off his obligations as agreed in the agreement. The land is material security which is most in demand by banking institutions as security of mortgage rights. The use of land as a trusted and consumptive credit is based on the consideration of the safest land and has a relatively high sale value. The urgency of objects Securing mortgage rights as stipulated in the credit agreement cannot be separated from the guarantee itself. Credit guarantees are always stated in an additional agreement, namely the Collateral agreement. The need for funds by people or institutions provides credit by providing excellent services and providing legal protection for the parties in the transaction so that no one is harmed in the transaction. The state provides legal protection by stipulating legal regulation relating to credit so that banks as creditors have legal certainty in the process of executing credit collateral objects for optimal repayment. Mortgage Law states that creditors have full rights in executing debtor's collateral goods when bad loans do not have to go through litigation.
Keywords
Full Text:
EnglishReferences
Adjiel, Habib and Brian Polly Purbawisesa, Legal Protection For The Creditor Related To The Deed Of Unregistered Mortgage Rights, IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) Volume 23, Issue 2, Ver. 1 (February. 2018) PP 43-46 e-ISSN: 2279-0837, p-ISSN: 2279-0845. http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jhss/papers/Vol.%2023%20Issue2/Version-1/G2302014346.pdf www.iosrjournals.org, accessed on 18 February 2021.
Ak, Syahmin, Hukum Kontrak Internasional, Jakarta, PT. Rajagrafindo Persada, 2006.
Bambang Sutiyoso dan Sri Hastusi Puspitasari, Aspek – Aspek Perkembangan Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia,Yogyakarta : UII Press, 2005.
Bahsan,M, Hukum Jaminan dan Jaminan Kredit Perbankan Indonesia, Jakarta, PT. Rajagrafindo Persada, 2010.
Catur Budi Dianawati dan Amin Purnawan, “Kajian Hukum Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Yang Dilelang Tanpa Proses Permohonan Lelang Eksekusi Ke Ketua Pengadilan Negeri”, Jurnal Akta, No. 2 (2017), p. 130-131. http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/akta/article/viewFile/1755/1315, accessed 04 April 2020.
Evie Hanavia dkk, “Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Berdasarkan Title Eksekutorial dalam Sertifikat Hak Tanggungan”, Repertorium, No. 1, (2017), 22. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/213261-none.pdf accessed 02 April 2020.
Harahap, M. Yahya, Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata, Jakarta : Sinar Grafika, 2005.
Harahap, Yahya, Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2009.
Hasan,Djuhaendah, Lembaga Jaminan Kebendaan bagi Tanah dan Benda lain yang Melekat pada Tanah dalam Konsepsi Penerapan Asas Pemisahan Horisontal, Jakarta : Nuansa Madani, 2011.
Hermansyah, Hukum Perbankan Nasional Indonesia, Jakarta:Kencana, 2009.
HS, Salim, Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia, Jakarta: Rajawali Press,2004.
Itoo, Rais Ahmad, Et.al, Effect of Loan Value and Collateral on Value of Mortgage Default, Int. J Latest Trends Fin. Eco. Sc. Vol‐3 No. 4 December, 2013https://repositorio.iscte-iul.pt/bitstream/10071/11799/1/publisher_version_884_3085_1_PB.pdf accessed on 18 February 2021.
Ivida Dewi Amrih Suci dan Herowati Poesoko, Hak Kreditur Separatis dalam Mengeksekusi Benda Jaminan Debitur Pailit, Yogyakarta: LaksBang Pressindo, 2009.
Jonaedi Efendi & Johnny Ibrahim, Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016.
John Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge:The Belnap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971.
Lea, Michael, Alternative Forms of Mortgage Finance: What Can We Learn From Other Countries? (US : San Diego State University, 2011), p. 7. http://absalonproject.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Harvard-Lea-110v5.pdf, accessed 02 April 2020.
Lutfi Walidani dan Habib Adjie, “Perlindungan Hukum Kreditur Terhadap Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 2859K/PDT/2011), RES JUDICATA, No. 1, 2018.
Mohammad Saleh dan Lilik Mulyadi, Bunga Rampai Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia : Perspektif Teoretis, Praktik dan Permasalahannya, Cetakan ke-1, Bandung: Alumni, 2012.
Muhammad Abdulkadir dan Muniarti Rilda, Lembaga Keuangan dan Pembiayaan, Bandung : Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000.
Peraturan Bank Indonesia No/.3/10/2001 Peraturan Bank Indonesia
Peraturan Bank Indonesia No.14 / 15 / PBI / 2012 Peraturan Bank Indonesia
Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan No.18 / POJK.3 / 2016 Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan
Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan No.42 / POJK.3 / 2017 tentang Kewajiban Penyusunan dan Pelaksanaan Kebijakan Perkreditan atau Pembiayaan Bank Bagi Bank Umum.
Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan No.40 / POJK.3 / 2019 Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan
Poesoko, Herowati, Parate Executie Objek Hak Tanggungan, Yogyakarta: Laksbang Pressindo, 2008.
Rand, Aynd, Pengantar Epistemologi Objektif, Penerjemah, Cuk Ananta Wijaya, Yogyakarta: Bentang Budaya, 2003.
Satrio, J., Hukum Jaminan Hak – Hak Jaminan Kebendaan, Bandung : PT. Citra Aditya Bhakti, 2007.
Simamora,Yohanes Sogar, Hukum Perjanjian Prinsip Hukum Kontrak Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Oleh Pemerintah, Surabaya: Laksbang Pressindo, 2009.
Suadi,Amran, Eksekusi Jaminan dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah, Jakarta, Kencana, 2019.
Sutantio, Retnowulan, Penelitian tentang Perlindungan Hukum Eksekusi Jaminan Kredit, Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional (BPHN), Jakarta: Departemen Kehakiman RI, 1999.
Sutarno, Aspek – Aspek Hukum Perkreditan pada Bank, Jakarta: Alfabeta, 2003.
Suyatno, H.R.M. Anton, Kepastian Hukum dalam Penyelesaian Kredit Macet Melalui Eksekusi Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Tanpa Proses Gugatan Pengadilan, Jakarta: Kencana, 2016.
Thain, Gerald Dan, A Basic Outline of the Law of Secured Transaction, Artikel dalam Seri Dasar Hukum Ekonomi 4 : Hukum Jaminan Indonesia, Jakarta: Proyek Elips, 1998.
Toman Sony Tambunan & Wilson R.G. Tambunan, Hukum Bisnis, Jakarta: Kencana, 2019.
Trisadini P.Usanti & Abd. Shomad, Hukum Perbankan, Jakarta, Kencana, 2017.
Undang-Undang Hak Tanggungan No.4/1996.
Undang-Undang Perbankan No.10/1998.
Usman, Rachmadi, Aspek – Aspek Hukum Perbankan di Indonesia, Jakarta : PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2001.
Yahman, Karakteristik Wanprestasi & Tindak Pidana Penipuan, Jakarta: Kencana, 2014. Suyatno,Anton, Kepastian Hukum Dalam Penyelesaian Kredit Macet Melalui Eksekusi Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Tanpa Proses Gugatan Pengadilan, Jakarta: Kencana, 2019.
Zhou, Zhihua, The Development of Mortgage Finance in China The Implications of International Experiences, (China Perspectives 2015/4 | 2015 Shaping the Chinese Internet, 2015), 55-56 Electronic reference Zhihua Zhou, « The Development of Mortgage Finance in China », China Perspectives [Online], 2015/4 | 2015, Online since 01 January 2017, connection on 28 October 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/6862, accessed 05 April 2020.
Zunzunegui, Fernando, Mortgage Credit Mis-selling of Financial Products, Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies Author: Fernando ZUNZUNEGUI Directorate-General for Internal Policies PE 618.995 - June 2018
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2018/618995/IPOL_STU(2018)618995_EN.pdf accessed on 18 February 2021
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/jhp.10.1.2021.31-63
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.