THE LEGAL POSITION OF WORKERS AS PREFERRED CREDITORS WHO BECOME THE APPLICANT FOR BANKRUPTCY AGAINST THE COMPANY

Ani Wijayati(1*), Anton Nainggolan(2), Yessi Melati Krisnawati(3)

(1) Universitas Kristen Indonesia
(2) Universitas Kristen Indonesia
(3) Universitas Kristen Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims to trace the contradictions of sentencing arrangements in child sexual abuse crimes in Aceh after the enactment of Qanun No. 6 of 2014 with Law No. 35 of 2014 on Child Protection. The regulation of child sexual abuse punishment in jinayat law in Aceh has different interpretations from other laws and regulations, including Law No. 35 of 2014 on Child Protection. So the essence of the deterrent effect for perpetrators that should be part of the goal of criminalization is not so achieved. In addition, Qanun Jinayat also has the potential for impunity for the government with Article 9 and Article 11 Qanun No. 6 of 2014 on the reasons for justification and forgiving reasons. The method used in this paper is a normative juridical method, using secondary data or library data. The study results showed that in Aceh, there had been a dualism of the legal regulation of child sexual abuse. The provisions of qanun jinayat are still many shortcomings in providing protection and rights for children as victims, so law enforcement tends to choose positive laws. It is recommended that the Aceh government to harmonize the law between jinayat law provisions and positive laws relating to sexual harassment.

Keywords


The Legal Position; Workers; Preferred Creditor; Bankruptcy

Full Text:

ENGLISH

References


Books

Barkatullah, T. P. (2014). Filsafat, Teori dan Ilmu Hukum, Pemikiran Menuju Masyarakat yang Berkeadilan dan Bermartabat. Jakarta: PT. RajaGafindo Persada .

Hartini, R. (Hukum Kepailitan). 2007. Malang: UMM Press.

Mamudji, S. S. (2009). Penelitian Hukum Normatif suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sjahdeini, S. R.(2008). Hukum Kepailitan Memahami Undang-undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan. Jakarta: Grafiti.

Soeroso, R. (1993). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: PT. Sinar Grafika.

Sularto, N. P. (2017). Hukum Kepailitan dan Keadilan Pancasila-Kajian Filsafat Hukum atas Kepailitan Badan Hukum Perseroan Terbatas di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Statute

Undang-undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan

Undang-undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004 tentang Penyelesaian Hubungan Industrial Undang-undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang

Journal

Boulton, A. J. (2002). Struktur Hubungan Industrial di Indonesia masa Mendatang. Jakarta: Kantor Perburuhan Internasional.

Christina NM Tobing, 2018, Menggagas Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial dalam Bingkai Ius - Constituendum sebagai Upaya Perwujudan Tahu Hukum dan Keadilan, Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pelita Harapan Medan, h.4-5

Dwi, F. (2020). Keabsahan Permohonan Pailit. Jurist-Diction, 972.

Pasaribu, M. (2014). Analisis Permohonan Pailit Terhadap Perseroan Terbatas oleh Tenaga Kerja. USU Law Journal, 118.

Website

Simanjuntak, 2008, "UU Kepailitan Versus Hak-Hak Buruh", bisa saja diakses

~://www.hukumonline.com, . pada tanggal 30 september 2020 pukul 20.42 wib

Wikipedia, 2020, “Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial” pada pada bulan 29 desember 2020 pada pukul 10.59 malam bisa diakses https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pengadilan_Hubungan_Industrial




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/jhp.10.2.2021.229-244

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Abstracting and Indexing by: