Prospects of AI Use in The Supreme Court: Comparison of Canada and Indonesia
Downloads
The opportunities and challenges of applying artificial intelligence (AI) in law enforcement are the main focus of a comparative study between the Indonesian Supreme Court and Canadian judicial guidelines. In Canada, AI has been used to support transparency, speed, and consistency in decisions through decision prediction, case management, and legal data processing. This serves as an important inspiration for Indonesia, which is currently exploring the use of similar technology in its judicial system. The main challenges faced by Indonesia include limited digital infrastructure, the absence of comprehensive regulations governing the use of AI, and concerns regarding the integrity of decisions and the principle of justice. A normative juridical method combined with a comparative literature review was employed to examine the regulatory frameworks, court practices, and applications of artificial intelligence in each country. The study's findings indicate that despite the significant challenges in Indonesia, the opportunities for AI implementation remain vast. AI implementation must be supported by adaptive national policies, capacity building for judicial officials, and continuous oversight to maintain the integrity of decisions and legal certainty. This study provides strategic recommendations for strengthening Indonesia's legal system in an increasingly complex and dynamic digital era.
Almeida, Denise, Konstantin Shmarko, and Elizabeth Lomas. “The Ethics of Facial Recognition Technologies, Surveillance, and Accountability in an Age of Artificial Intelligence: A Comparative Analysis of US, EU, and UK Regulatory Frameworks.” AI and Ethics 2, no. 3 (2022): 377–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00077-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00077-w
Amina Catherine Ijiga, Enoch Joseph Aboi, Idoko Peter Idoko, Lawrence Anebi Enyejo, and Micheal Olumubo Odeyemi. “Collaborative Innovations in Artificial Intelligence (AI): Partnering with Leading U.S. Tech Firms to Combat Human Trafficking.” Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Advances 18, no. 3 (2024): 106–23. https://doi.org/10.30574/gjeta.2024.18.3.0046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/gjeta.2024.18.3.0046
Amiruddin and Zainal Asikin. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Rajawali Press, 2012.
Ana Rahmatyar and Muhammad Rosikhu. “Implementasi Nilai Pancasila Dalam Pelaksanaan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia.” INNOVATIVE: Journal of Social Science Research 4, no. 3 (2024).
Anggen Suari, Kadek Rima, and I Made Sarjana. “Menjaga Privasi di Era Digital: Perlindungan Data Pribadi di Indonesia.” Jurnal Analisis Hukum 6, no. 1 (2023): 132–42. https://doi.org/10.38043/jah.v6i1.4484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38043/jah.v6i1.4484
Anis, Muhammad, Sufirman Rahman, and Nasrullah Arsyad. “Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Kehutanan Bidang Illegal Logging Balai Pengamanan dan Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehuanan (BPPHLHK) Wilayah Sulawesi.” Journal of Lex Philosophy (JLP) 3, no. 2 (2022): 375–92. https://doi.org/10.52103/jlp.v3i2.1479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52103/jlp.v3i2.1479
Awotula, Damilola. “Indicium Ex Machina: Unstructured Sentencing and Disparate Outcomes in Canada.” Dalhousie University, 2023.
Becher, Samuel, and Benjamin Alarie. “LexOptima: The Promise of AI-Enabled Legal Systems.” University of Toronto Law Journal 75, no. 1 (2025): 73–121. https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj-2024-0002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj-2024-0002
Butt, Junaid Sattar. “The Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on the Efficiency of Administrative Decision Making Including Ethical & Legal Considerations and Comparative Study about Countries Already Incorporated AI for Administrative Decisions.” JURIDICA 19, no. 3 (n.d.).
Campbell, Ray Worthy. “Artificial Intelligence in the Courtroom: The Delivery of Justice in the Age of Machine Learning.” SSRN Electronic Journal, ahead of print, 2023. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4425791. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4425791
Christian, Gideon. “Legal Framework For The Use Of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Technology In The Canadian Criminal Justice System.” SSRN Electronic Journal, ahead of print, 2024. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4712508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4712508
Davydova, Iryna, Ihor Andronov, Serhii Zhurylo, Volodymyr Zubar, and Inna Iliopol. “Prospects for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Jurisprudence: From the Educational Process to Legal Practice. The Experience of China.” Eduweb 17, no. 4 (2023): 87–95. https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2023.17.04.9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2023.17.04.9
Elisabeth Nurhaini Butar-Butar. Metode Penelitian Hukum, Langkah-Langkah Untuk Menemukan Kebenaran Dalam Ilmu Hukum. PT. Refika Aditama, 2018.
Eugenia, Felicia, Carla Joycelyne Limanto, and Dave David Tedjokusumo. “Tantangan Praktis dalam Proses Pembuktian Perkara Pidana: Kredibilitas Saksi dan Validitas Bukti Elektronik.” IURIS STUDIA: Jurnal Kajian Hukum 5, no. 2 (2024).
Gobert, Stefan, Yander L. Diez, Marlies Monnens, et al. FIGURE 7. Cheliplana Elkhornica Karling, 1989, from British Columbia, Canada. A in A Revision of the Genus Cheliplana de Beauchamp, 1927 (Rhabdocoela: Schizorhynchia), with the Description of Six New Species. Zenodo, May 17, 2021. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4766706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4970.3.2
Greenstein, Stanley. “Preserving the Rule of Law in the Era of Artificial Intelligence (AI).” Artificial Intelligence and Law 30, no. 3 (2022): 291–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-021-09294-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-021-09294-4
Hadiyati, Nur, and Hayllen Stathany. “Analisis Undang-Undang ITE Berdasarkan Asas Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.” Mizan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 10, no. 2 (2021): 146. https://doi.org/10.32503/mizan.v10i2.1657. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32503/mizan.v10i2.1657
Jain. “Big Data Privacy: A Technological Perspective and Review.” Journal of Big Data 3 (2016). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-016-0059-y
Kabir, Shahin, and Mohammad Nazmul Alam. “IoT, Big Data and AI Applications in the Law Enforcement and Legal System: A Review.” International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) 10, no. 05 (2023).
Kandriana, Muhammad, and Mirham Imamsyah. “Efektivitas Artificial Intelligence Dalam Penegakan Hukum: Telaah Dari Perspektif Filsafat Hukum.” Journal of Science and Social Research, 2025.
Kashkin, S. Yu. “Proposals for Modernization of Legal Regulation of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Technologies in Russia with Platform Legal Models.” Kutafin Law Review 8, no. 3 (2021): 370–89. https://doi.org/10.17803/2313-5395.2021.3.17.370-389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17803/2313-5395.2021.3.17.370-389
Kusak, Martyna. “Quality of Data Sets That Feed AI and Big Data Applications for Law Enforcement.” ERA Forum 23, no. 2 (2022): 209–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-022-00719-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-022-00719-4
Maylani, Uyla, Damai Vistiani Gulo, and Farhan Lutfhi Azidan. “Penegakan Hukum Mengenai Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) di Indonesia.” PLEDOI (Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan) 1, no. 1 (2022): 12–18. https://doi.org/10.56721/pledoi.v1i1.27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56721/pledoi.v1i1.27
Mezrich, Jonathan L. “Is Artificial Intelligence (AI) a Pipe Dream? Why Legal Issues Present Significant Hurdles to AI Autonomy.” American Journal of Roentgenology 219, no. 1 (2022): 152–56. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.21.27224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.21.27224
Mrs Supriya Shree, Riddhi Arya, and Saket Kumar Roy. “Investigating the Evolving Landscape of Deepfake Technology: Generative AI’s Role in it’s Generation and Detection.” International Research Journal on Advanced Engineering Hub (IRJAEH) 2, no. 05 (2024): 1489–511. https://doi.org/10.47392/IRJAEH.2024.0206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47392/IRJAEH.2024.0206
Naibaho, Rinsofat, and Indra Jaya M. Hasibuan. “Peranan Mahkamah Agung Dalam Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan Melalui Kekuasaan Kehakiman.” Nommensen Journal of Legal Opinion (NJLO) 2, no. 02 (2021): 203–14. https://doi.org/10.51622/njlo.v2i02.388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51622/njlo.v2i02.388
Onyefulu-Kingston, Annabelle Ogochukwu. “AI-Based Technologies in International Arbitration: An Exploratory Study on the Practicability of Applying AI Tools on International Arbitration.” World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Computer and Information Engineering 18, no. 10 (2024).
Pagar, Pagar, Ansari Ansari, and Adenita Sahfitri. “Efektivitas Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 Tentang Electronic Litigation Di Era Pandemi Covid-19 dalam Konsep Maslahah Mursalah.” Al-Mashlahah Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial 10, no. 01 (2022): 315. https://doi.org/10.30868/am.v10i01.2437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30868/am.v10i01.2437
Parycek, Peter, Verena Schmid, and Anna-Sophie Novak. “Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Automation in Administrative Procedures: Potentials, Limitations, and Framework Conditions.” Journal of the Knowledge Economy 15, no. 2 (2023): 8390–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01433-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01433-3
Rachid Ejjami. “AI-Driven Justice: Evaluating the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Legal Systems.” International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research 6, no. 3 (2024): 23969. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i03.23969. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i03.23969
Reznik, Oleg, Maryna Utkina, Mykola Starinskyi, Nataliia Isaieva, and Liudmyla Kysil. “Judicial Protection Service and Its Analogues: A Comparative Legal Research.” Revista Amazonia Investiga 10, no. 47 (2021): 47–53. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2021.47.11.5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2021.47.11.5
Roksandic, Suncana, Nikola Protrka, and Marc Engelhart. “Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence and Its Use by Law Enforcement Authorities: Where Do We Stand?” 2022 45th Jubilee International Convention on Information, Communication and Electronic Technology (MIPRO), May 23, 2022, 1225–32. https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO55190.2022.9803606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO55190.2022.9803606
Rossner, Meredith, David Tait, and Martha McCurdy. “Justice Reimagined: Challenges and Opportunities with Implementing Virtual Courts.” Current Issues in Criminal Justice 33, no. 1 (2021): 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2020.1859968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2020.1859968
Saragih, Geofani Milthree. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Lanjut Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Oleh Lembaga Negara Di Indonesia.” Skripsi, Universitas Riau, 2022.
Saragih, Geofani Milthree, Ade Sathya Sanathana Ishwara, and Rengga Kusuma Putra. “Evaluation of the Implementation of Pancasila Values and Human Rights Enforcement in Indonesian Judicial System Through Constitutional Approach.” Reformasi Hukum 28, no. 3 (2024): 202–17. https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v28i3.1082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v28i3.1082
Setiawan, Heru, I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani, M. Guntur Hamzah, and Hilaire Tegnan. “Digitalization of Legal Transformation on Judicial Review in the Constitutional Court.” Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System 4, no. 2 (2024): 263–98. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v4i2.263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v4i2.263
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors confirm the transfer of all copyrights of the manuscripts to the Board Editors of Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan upon its acceptance for publication and that the Board Editors of Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan have the right to publish, republish, transmit, and distribute them in the JHP journal or other media.
- Manuscripts published by Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution -NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Every submitted manuscript should be accompanied by a "Copyright Notice" and "Ethical Statement".










