Comparative Analysis of Judicial Statistics Reform
Insights From The US, Canada, and The UK
Downloads
In the context of modern judiciaries, the effective utilization of judicial statistics is pivotal for informed decision-making and policy formulation. Indonesia, like many nations, faces challenges in the dissemination, content coherence, raw data sharing, historical analysis, and collaborative efforts concerning judicial statistics. This research addresses these gaps by proposing innovative solutions to enhance the efficacy of judicial statistics in Indonesia. The primary objective is to transform the existing landscape by advocating for the adoption of web-based platforms, restructuring content and format, resolving raw data dissemination challenges, emphasizing the significance of historical data, and promoting collaborative efforts between research institutions and court data centers. The purpose is to provide a comprehensive framework that not only addresses current issues but also lays the foundation for sustainable, transparent, and informed statistical practices. This study employs a qualitative approach through a comparative analysis, examining existing literature, policy documents, and judicial statistics practices in the US, Canada, and the UK. By contrasting these systems with Indonesia’s framework, the study identifies best practices and potential improvements for judicial data management. The research presents a multifaceted approach to enhance the efficacy of judicial statistics in Indonesia. By transitioning to web-based platforms, ensuring content coherence, addressing raw data dissemination challenges, emphasizing historical data analysis, and promoting collaborative efforts, the proposed framework offers practical solutions. Implementation of these strategies can significantly improve the accessibility, accuracy, and relevance of judicial statistics. Consequently, this approach not only benefits researchers and policymakers but also fosters transparency and accountability within the Indonesian judiciary, paving the way for evidence-based decision-making and informed policy formulation in the legal sector.
Agrawal, Sandeep K., Pradeep Sangapala, Elisabeth Hill, and Jill Lang. "Human rights and municipal land use bylaws in Atlantic Canada." Planning Practice & Research (2024): 1-24.https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2024.2359790 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2024.2359790
Albrecht, Kat, and Kaitlyn Filip. "Public Records Aren't Public: Systemic Barriers to Measuring Court Functioning & Equity." J. Crim. L. & Criminology 113 (2023): 1.
Adler, Rachel F., Andrew Paley, Andong L. Li Zhao, Harper Pack, Sergio Servantez, Adam R. Pah, Kristian Hammond, and SCALES OKN Consortium. "A user-centered approach to developing an AI system analyzing US federal court data." Artificial Intelligence and Law 31, no. 3 (2023): 547-570.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-022-09320-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-022-09320-z
Anderson, Brent, Trevor Bant, Meera Bennett, Sebastian Chern, Kaitlyn Chewka, Andrew Crabtree, Lindsey A. Cruickshank et al. "The CanLII Manual to British Columbia Civil Litigation." (2020).
Andresen, Martin A., Tarah Hodgkinson, and Samantha Henderson. "Statistician's Blues: A Methodological Critique of Measuring the Association between Police and Crime." Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 66, no. 2 (2024): 66-80.https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj-2024-0030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj-2024-0030
Atadoga, Akoh, Oluwatoyin Ajoke Farayola, Benjamin Samson Ayinla, Olukunle Oladipupo Amoo, Temitayo Oluwaseun Abrahams, and Femi Osasona. "A comparative review of data encryption methods in the USA and Europe." Computer Science & IT Research Journal 5, no. 2 (2024): 447-460.https://doi.org/10.51594/csitrj.v5i2.815 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51594/csitrj.v5i2.815
Baldeo, Shawn, Janooshsheya Balasundaram, Maria McDonald, Abel Ickowicz, and Kathleen A. Sheehan. "Exploring the tensions between judicial transparency and respect for privacy at Ontario's consent and capacity board: An examination of findings in 2015 and 2019." Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie 69, no. 3 (2023): 228.https://doi.org/10.1177/07067437231170780 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07067437231170780
Bell, Felicity, Lyria Bennett Moses, Michael Legg, Jacob Silove, and Monika Zalnieriute. "AI Decision-Making and the Courts: A Guide for Judges, Tribunal Members and Court Administrators." Australasian Institute of Judicial Administration (2023).
Bracci, Christa, and Erica Friesen. Legal Research Online: Information Seeking in the Digital Environment. 2024.
Bright, David, Russell Brewer, and Carlo Morselli. "Reprint of: Using social network analysis to study crime: Navigating the challenges of criminal justice records." Social Networks 69 (2022): 235-250.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2022.01.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2022.01.008
Carpenter, Anna E., Alyx Mark, Colleen F. Shanahan, and Jessica K. Steinberg. "The field of state civil courts." Colum. L. Rev. 122 (2022): 1165.
Cotropia, Christopher A. "The SCALES project: Making federal court records free." Northwestern University Law Review 119, no. 1 (2024): 23.
David, Jean-Denis, and Megan Mitchell. "Contacts with the police and the over-representation of indigenous peoples in the Canadian criminal justice system." Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 63, no. 2 (2021): 23-45.https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.2020-0004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.2020-0004
Dencik, Lina. "The datafied welfare state: A perspective from the UK." In New perspectives in critical data studies: The ambivalences of data power, pp. 145-165. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96180-0_7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96180-0_7
Dencik, Lina, Emiliano Treré, Joanna Redden, and Arne Hintz. "Data justice." (2022): 1-100.https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529770131 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529770131
Djamaludin, Djamaludin, Muhammad Fahruddin Aziz, Yanuariansyah Ar-Rasyid, and Iskandar Ali As-Sayyid. "Assessing the Impact of Electronic Court Systems on the Efficiency of Judicial Processes in the Era of Digital Transformation." Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi (2023): 1-18.https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v6i1.8082 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v6i1.8082
Drake, Archie, Perry Keller, Irene Pietropaoli, Anuj Puri, Spyros Maniatis, Joe Tomlinson, Jack Maxwell et al. "Legal contestation of artificial intelligence-related decision-making in the United Kingdom: reflections for policy." International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 36, no. 2 (2022): 251-285.https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2021.1999075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2021.1999075
Erman, Sevgui, Eric Rancourt, Yanick Beaucage, and Andre Loranger. "The use of data science in a national statistical office." (2022).https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.13e1d60e DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.13e1d60e
Grajzl, Peter, and Peter Murrell. "Caselaw and England's economic performance during the Industrial Revolution: Data and evidence." Journal of Comparative Economics 52, no. 1 (2024): 145-165.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2023.10.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2023.10.002
Hansen, Charlotte Juul, Lina Maria Sanchez Cespedes, Leonardo Trujillo Oyola, Xeni Kristine Dimakos, Bianca Walsh, Renata Souza Bueno, Amos T. Kabo-Bah, Omar Seidu, and Vibeke Oestreich Nielsen. "Collaboration between national statistical offices and academia: Benefits, conditions, areas of collaboration and practical level experience in countries." Statistical Journal of the IAOS 40, no. 1 (2024): 161-172.https://doi.org/10.3233/SJI-230117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/SJI-230117
Hannan, Abd, and Zainuddin Syarif. "The High Rate of Judicial Divorce among Women of Lower Education in Madura-Indonesia: A Gender Perspective." Palastren: Jurnal Studi Gender 16, no. 1 (2023): 29-58.https://doi.org/10.21043/palastren.v16i1.15286 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21043/palastren.v16i1.15286
Hannaford-Agor, Paula. "" How exactly is it done here?" Conducting cross-jurisdictional research with judges and court staff." Oñati Socio-Legal Series 13, no. S1 (2023): S102-S120.https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1702 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1702
Hanretty, Chris. "Courts in the United Kingdom." In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1780 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1780
Hughes, Emily, and Kori Khan. "One Court, One State, One Year: What We Don't Know About Criminal Defendants' Testimony and Why It Matters." Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 57, no. 2 (2024): 333.
Hemmings, Mary. "The CanLII Manual to British Columbia Civil Litigation: A User-Friendly Guide." Can. L. Libr. Rev. 47 (2022): 20.
Hauck, Tanya S., Rachel Goud, Michele Warner, Susan Franchuk, Juveria Zaheer, Vicky Stergiopoulos, Victor M. Tang, and Leslie Buckley. "Capacity to Consent to Treatment of Substance Use Disorders at Ontario's Consent and Capacity Board: A Review of Past Reported Decisions." The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry (2024): 07067437241261488.https://doi.org/10.1177/07067437241261488 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07067437241261488
Huq, Aziz Z., and Zachary D. Clopton. "The necessary and proper stewardship of judicial data." Stanford Law Review 76 (2024).
Kusdarini, Eny, Anang Priyanto, Sri Hartini, and Suripno Suripno. "Roles of justice courts: settlement of general election administrative disputes in Indonesia." Heliyon 8, no. 12 (2022).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11932 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11932
Lageson, Sarah E., Elizabeth Webster, and Juan R. Sandoval. "Digitizing and disclosing personal data: The proliferation of state criminal records on the internet." Law & Social Inquiry 46, no. 3 (2021): 635-665.https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2020.37 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2020.37
Marune, Abraham Ethan Martupa Sahat, and Brandon Hartanto. "Strengthening personal data protection, cyber security, and improving public awareness in Indonesia: Progressive legal perspective." International Journal of Business, Economics, and Social Development 2, no. 4 (2021): 143-152.https://doi.org/10.46336/ijbesd.v2i4.170 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46336/ijbesd.v2i4.170
Matyas, David, Peter Wills, and Barry Dewitt. "Imagining Resilient Courts: from COVID-19 to the Future of Canada's Court System." Canadian Public Policy 48, no. 1 (2022): 186-208.https://doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2021-015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2021-015
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors confirm the transfer of all copyrights of the manuscripts to the Board Editors of Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan upon its acceptance for publication and that the Board Editors of Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan have the right to publish, republish, transmit, and distribute them in the JHP journal or other media.
- Manuscripts published by Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution -NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Every submitted manuscript should be accompanied by a "Copyright Notice" and "Ethical Statement".
