Strengthening Courtroom Integrity in Indonesia
Addressing Technological and Security Challenges Through Global Best Practice
Downloads
Maintaining order in the courtroom is essential for ensuring fair and efficient judicial proceedings. However, Indonesian courts face increasing challenges in managing courtroom decorum due to evolving disruptive behaviors driven by technological advancements and societal changes under the 4th Industrial Revolution. This research examines the current state of courtroom management in Indonesia, identifying gaps such as unauthorized electronic recordings, inadequate systems for remote trial decorum, and insufficient courtroom security measures. Using a literature-methods approach, the study analyzes incident reports, judicial practices, and international best practices from countries like Germany, Japan, and Canada. Findings reveal significant weaknesses in the regulation of technology use, courtroom security frameworks, and the public perception of traditional practices. The research concludes that Indonesia's judiciary must adopt forward-thinking strategies to enhance courtroom management and public trust. Key recommendations for the Supreme Court include regulating electronic device usage, establishing a court police system, introducing summary procedures for in-court offenses, and revising the "all rise" practice to align with cultural sensitivities. These measures ensure a resilient, adaptive judiciary prepared to address current and future challenges effectively.
Ahmed, Rozha Kamal, Khder Hassan Muhammed, Ingrid Pappel, and Dirk Draheim. "Impact of e-court systems implementation: a case study." Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 15, no. 1 (2021): 108-128.https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-01-2020-0008
Alkon, Cynthia. "Criminal Court System Failures During COVID-19: An Empirical Study." Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 37 (2022): 453.
Anleu, Sharyn Roach, Jennifer K. Elek, and Kathy Mack. "Researching judicial emotion and emotion management." In Research Handbook on Law and Emotion, pp. 180-195. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021.
Anleu, Sharyn Roach, Kathy Mack, Jennifer Elek, and David Rottman. "Judicial ethics, everyday work, and emotion management." Journal of Law and Courts 8, no. 1 (2020): 127-150.https://doi.org/10.1086/703700
Armia, Muhammad Siddiq. "Constitutional courts and law reform: a case study of Indonesia." PhD diss., Anglia Ruskin Research Online (ARRO), 2023.
Bannon, Alicia L., and Douglas Keith. "Remote court: principles for virtual proceedings during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond." Nw. UL REv. 115 (2020): 1875.
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors confirm the transfer of all copyrights of the manuscripts to the Board Editors of Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan upon its acceptance for publication and that the Board Editors of Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan have the right to publish, republish, transmit, and distribute them in the JHP journal or other media.
- Manuscripts published by Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution -NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Every submitted manuscript should be accompanied by a "Copyright Notice" and "Ethical Statement".











